Hi Kim,
I do not think your drawing is suicidal as you say. You
are lying down on the roof, not standing at the edge. On the other
hand, you are prone, which might suggest a kind of passivity or giving
in.
I'm going to do another version of this picture.
(Kim:
Above.)
What do you think?
(Kim:
Isn't that a funny statement. It should be "how
do you think?")
Good point.
I am confused about what website we are using internally.
it seems
as if I have several urls. is there one that i should be using
all the
time?
(Kim:
They have now done a major upgrade on my server and it is fine again.
See: http://kimmosley.com/kimmosley/art/lipkinconversation/conversation/
Everything now is up to date.)
Also, I showed some of what
we have done to a few people and they think the way the stuff is
laid out is confusing. It is hard to follow the thread of conversation.
(Kim:
We can think more about this...but I'm not sure if that is a
problem or just that they have the wrong expectations.)
I
think narratives are difficult enough to follow over a course
of time. We do not need to create additional
difficulties that may dissuade people
from staying with it. i vote sequential.
So I am thinking that we should
run all of the links day by day (and there can be a categories next to
each date on the side) but all of the text and drawings should be sequential.
(Kim:
Oh, that is easy to do. If you click on the images, or on the "next" button
at the bottom of each page you'll move sequentially. If you want
me to change the navigation bar
on the left
as well, that is easy. It looks like it is repeated on each page...but
I only have to change it once and it changes on all pages (magic!).)
I
also do want us to post a new story every day. does that mean
would make an additional drawing and an additional
narrative by me every day?
(Kim: I can only make one drawing a day. You know
that they take hours.)
Ok. it might be interesting to sometimes
do drawings based on the news story and sometimes on our exchanges,
and i will do the same. i
don't want to be myopic here.
I also want to run a news story
every day, regardless of whether or not we comment on it. gives our
experiment in time a wider perspective.
What or how do you think about that?
(Kim:
We are dancing and not sure who is leading. But that is what
is interesting. It is what the used to call the "war of
the sexes.")
I don't agree. I mean, I agree that
it is interesting but i don't necessarily think we are enacting
a war of the sexes, with or
without quotation
marks.
Is that how you see it? or is that what you would like it
to be?
(Kim:
It isn't a violent war...just a dissonance.)
Certainly
we are influenced by our experiences as men or women. but
we are also having different perspectives generationally,
in terms
of our chosen genres, etc.
(Kim:
...and what caused some people to find happiness in romancing
their own sex.)
Maybe some. But do not make the mistake
that all lgbt people are oriented towards their own sex for that
reason. My interest in women is not necessarily a reaction to bad
experiences
with men.
I have
also had some very good experiences with
men, sexually, socially
and otherwise.
Attraction is complicated. and my interest in
women is its own thing. Why wouldn't someone
be attracted to women?
Think about
it. Think about why you are attracted to women.
(Kim:
Do we really know why we make the choices we do? I imagine that
if I woke up tomorrow as
a woman then I'd be a lesbian.)
Joan
Tuesday, Nov 29, 2005
11:05 a.m.